Mhc adv vinoth pandian law tips

[2/21, 16:04] Vinothpandian: 2008 (2) SCC 660 : state of punjab vs jalour singh : lok Adalats should resist their temptation to play the part of judges and constantly strive to function as concillators
[2/21, 16:04] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 391 : shri shiva kumar pradhan vs smt meena Rawat : Provisions of section 127 CRPC are always subject to provisions of section 125 CRPC and if a person ceases to be entitled to receive maintainance under section 125 CRPC he cannot seek an order of enhancement under sec 127 CRPC 1973
[2/21, 16:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CTC 639 : sidharth S vs P lalitha kumari : Power under order 38 rule 5 CPC 1908 is drastic and extraordinary , such power should not be exercised mechanically or merely for asking
[2/21, 16:04] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) CTC 481 : Abdul kalam Azad AL vs AL jawaharlal rep by power agent : Award of lok adalat can be challenged only by filing writ petition under article 226 or 227 of constitution on very limited grounds
[2/21, 16:04] Vinothpandian: 2007 (4) crimes 244 : sarav investment & FCPL vs lyods register of shipping IOSPF : In a cheque dishonour case service of notice is a part of cause of action for lodging complaint
[2/21, 16:04] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 425 : sudha sharma & another vs punjab national bank : provision of sec 13 of SARFASI act not dependent on any other provision of law , complete code in itself to enforce security interest ,