Mhc adv Vinothpandian Law tips

[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) SCC 307 : kanwar singh saini vs high court of delhi : for violation of a judgement or decree , provisions of criminal contempt not attracted
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 476 : national laminate corporation , mumbai vs Euro merchandise pvt ltd : In a SARFASI litigation , merely because a borrower desires to approach higher court cannot be a ground to stay an order already passed as against him
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 488 : super cassettes industries ltd vs music broadcast pvt ltd : Held in matters under order 39 rules 1 & 2 and sec 151 CPC 1908 , an interim relief granting final relief should be given after exercise of great caution and in rare and exceptional cases
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2015 (12) SCC 46 : Rohini traders vs JK lakshmi cement ltd : Held object of order X11 rule 8 of the code is to facilitate the plaintiff or any other party to get a document on record which is not in their possession or in possession of the other party
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 475 ; Dr Bibhas debnath vs state of west bengal : pleadings in a proceedings under sec 125 CRPC are like pleadings in a civil case and pleadings could be amended in appropriate circumstances
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 365 : Balaji baliram mupade vs state of maharastra : judgements normally to be prounounced within 2 months of conclusion of arguments , on expiry of 3 months parties can file application in high court seeking early judgement
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 600 : kotak mahindra bank pvt ltd vs Ambuj A kasliwal SC : ordinarily deposit of 50% of decretal amount due mandatory under sec 21 of RDDBFI act , but in appropriate cases for reasons to be recorded deposit of at least 25% permissible
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2020 (4) CTC 497 : Ravindranath GE medical associates pvt ltd chennai vs P Raja rao : while granting interim injunction or continuing existing injunction , court must see if there is bonafide contest between parties , court must also find which side balance of convenience lies ( order 39 CPC 1908 )
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : An injunction which is sought by pleading wrong facts is liable to be vacated ( order 39 rule 1 CPC 1908 )
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2009 (5) SCC 713 : vimal chand ghevarchand jain vs Ramakant eknath jadoo : Held equitable relief can be prayed for by a party which approaches court with clean hands
[2/20, 13:46] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 673 : K padma vs K Ramachandran & others : Property attached in favour of bank earlier to alleged agreement for sale , provisions of sec 64 of CPC not applicable
[2/20, 13:46] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) CTC 726 : sathu dharmananda saraswathi swamigal trust vs sree shanmugha seva sangam.nattar trust : CPC 1908 order 17 held no law says that once memo is filed stating petition of transfer is filed matter to be adjourned
[2/20, 13:46] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CTC 305 : Polyhose india pvt ltd vs inspector general of registration : With regard to sale certificate issued to auction purchaser under SARFASI act , held auction purchaser liable to pay 5% stamp duty under the stamp act , not required to pay stamp duty on guideline value
[2/20, 13:47] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) SCC ( cri ) 282 : state rep by inspector of police vs R vasanthi stanley : lack of awareness , knowledge or intent is neither to be considered nor accepted in economic offences