![சனாதானம் அமைச்சர்கள் பதவி பறிக் கோரி வழக்கு judge anithasumanth order to produce பேச்சு ஆதாரம் [10/6, 11:47] sekarreporter1: அனல் பறக்கும் வாதம் பரபரப்பு விசாரணை For. Udayanith senior adv p Wilson for sekar babu senior adv N. jothi former mp former cm jayalaitha adv](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story கல்லூரிகள் திறப்பு: யுஜிசி அவசர ஆலோசனை
- Previous story Reiterating the settled legal position that toll fees are not a source of revenue for the state but are compensatory in nature and is collected to reimburse the amount spent on construction of roads, a division bench of Justice M Sathyanarayanan and Justice M Nirmal Kumar issued dismissed a PIL
Recent Posts
- mhc today sep 10 news round up
- There are two instances possible. One at the instigation of the prisoners and other at the instigation of the prison authority. Once the prison authorities strictly comply with the rules, possibility of unrest inside the prison may be minimised. Therefore, equal treatment of prisoners will also be a theory for better administration of prisoners. Inequality will create frustration and restlessness in the mind of the prisoners and therefore the prison authorities are expected to perform their duties lawfully and scrupulously in accordance with the prison manual. It is needless to state that the prisoners who are committing misconduct or offences are liable to be punished under the prison manual by following due procedures as contemplated. Therefore, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has to secure appropriate instructions and file an affidavit.
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAEXTRA-ORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTIONSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3056 OF 2023CHOUDAPPA & ANR. PETITIONER(S)VERSUS CHOUDAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)ORDERHeard learned senior counsel for theparties.The challenge in the present special leave petition is to the revisional order dated 22nd July, 2022 passed by the High Court dismissing the revision of the petitioners arising from the rejection of their application alleged to have been filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(for short, ‘C.P.C.’).A suit for recovery of possession and
- Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice R. Mahadevan clarified that an application seeking the determination of mesne profits, even if filed decades later, is merely a reminder for the court to complete an inquiry and does not constitute a new suit or execution.
- வக்கீல் ஏற்காடு ஏ.மோகன்தாஸ் தரப்பில் வக்கீல் யானை ராஜேந்திரன் ஆஜராகி, ‘‘கள்ளக்குறிச்சி கைதான கண்ணுக்குட்டி என்பவர் மீது 31 சாராய வழக்குகள் உள்ளன. 20 ஆண்டுகளாக சாராய தொழில் செய்வதாக கூறியுள்ளார். அதனால், ஆளும் கட்சியாக தி.மு.க., மீது மட்டும் குற்றம் சாட்டவில்லை. சாராய தொழிலுக்கு அ.தி.மு.க.,வும் துணை போய் உள்ளது. உள்ளூர்
More
Recent Posts
- mhc today sep 10 news round up
- There are two instances possible. One at the instigation of the prisoners and other at the instigation of the prison authority. Once the prison authorities strictly comply with the rules, possibility of unrest inside the prison may be minimised. Therefore, equal treatment of prisoners will also be a theory for better administration of prisoners. Inequality will create frustration and restlessness in the mind of the prisoners and therefore the prison authorities are expected to perform their duties lawfully and scrupulously in accordance with the prison manual. It is needless to state that the prisoners who are committing misconduct or offences are liable to be punished under the prison manual by following due procedures as contemplated. Therefore, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has to secure appropriate instructions and file an affidavit.
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAEXTRA-ORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTIONSPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3056 OF 2023CHOUDAPPA & ANR. PETITIONER(S)VERSUS CHOUDAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)ORDERHeard learned senior counsel for theparties.The challenge in the present special leave petition is to the revisional order dated 22nd July, 2022 passed by the High Court dismissing the revision of the petitioners arising from the rejection of their application alleged to have been filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(for short, ‘C.P.C.’).A suit for recovery of possession and
- Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice R. Mahadevan clarified that an application seeking the determination of mesne profits, even if filed decades later, is merely a reminder for the court to complete an inquiry and does not constitute a new suit or execution.
- வக்கீல் ஏற்காடு ஏ.மோகன்தாஸ் தரப்பில் வக்கீல் யானை ராஜேந்திரன் ஆஜராகி, ‘‘கள்ளக்குறிச்சி கைதான கண்ணுக்குட்டி என்பவர் மீது 31 சாராய வழக்குகள் உள்ளன. 20 ஆண்டுகளாக சாராய தொழில் செய்வதாக கூறியுள்ளார். அதனால், ஆளும் கட்சியாக தி.மு.க., மீது மட்டும் குற்றம் சாட்டவில்லை. சாராய தொழிலுக்கு அ.தி.மு.க.,வும் துணை போய் உள்ளது. உள்ளூர்