Follow:
- Next story The ESI corporation memorandum dt 6/8/2020 the bond conditions was modified as five year to one year. The writ petitioners completed their one year service in esi hospital. Hence the above 13 writ petitioners filed withdrawal petition. The writ petitions came before justice Anand Venkatesh on 25th sep
- Previous story Mr. R. Subramanian, J.full orderCompulsory service – Merely because, petitioners, had secured a certain percentage of marks, were allotted to the third respondent College in the general counselling held by the State Government, they do not form a separate class.
Recent Posts
- Madurai Bench of the High Court Criticises District Judge for Ordering FIR Against Former Thanjavur SP Ashish Rawat*
- HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.14624 of 2026 AND W.M.P.No.15868 of 2026 Paramasivam
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy declined Zoho’s request to have the posts removed or “screened” at this stage, observing that it was not yet clear whether the alleged discrepancies were attributable to Zoho’s software or to the payment gateway used by FlexyPe.
- Advt M. Purusothaman: Lordship Hon’ble Mr.Justice V Laksminarayanan Madras high Court had passed a very important judgement in W.P.No.40146 of 2025 dated 22.04.2026. Petitioner P Jothibasu had sought various information about the method of procurement done by the Respondent /Tamil Nadu Co-operative Marketing Federation (TANFED) under RTI Act since .02.05.2023 onwards. The same was refused by relying upon
- HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 21.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3481 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.2761 and 2763 of 2024 Jayaraman @ Pattti Jayaraman … Petitioner/Accused No.5 Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep . by the Sub Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.
More
Recent Posts
- Madurai Bench of the High Court Criticises District Judge for Ordering FIR Against Former Thanjavur SP Ashish Rawat*
- HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.14624 of 2026 AND W.M.P.No.15868 of 2026 Paramasivam
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy declined Zoho’s request to have the posts removed or “screened” at this stage, observing that it was not yet clear whether the alleged discrepancies were attributable to Zoho’s software or to the payment gateway used by FlexyPe.
- Advt M. Purusothaman: Lordship Hon’ble Mr.Justice V Laksminarayanan Madras high Court had passed a very important judgement in W.P.No.40146 of 2025 dated 22.04.2026. Petitioner P Jothibasu had sought various information about the method of procurement done by the Respondent /Tamil Nadu Co-operative Marketing Federation (TANFED) under RTI Act since .02.05.2023 onwards. The same was refused by relying upon
- HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 21.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3481 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.2761 and 2763 of 2024 Jayaraman @ Pattti Jayaraman … Petitioner/Accused No.5 Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep . by the Sub Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.