MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.Nos.22670 of 2019 & 113 of 2020 Tnpsc case order by Sekar Reporter · February 14, 2020 [2/14, 15:38] Sekarreporter: 1 W.P.Nos.22670/2019 & 113/2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 11.02.2020 Delivered on 14.02.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.Nos.22670 of 2019 & 113 of 2020 and WMP Nos.22149/2019 & 137/2020 A.Babu Prasanth .. Petitioner in Both WPs .vs. 1.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Toad, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 2.The Controller of Examinations, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. 3.Tmt.S.Selvakumar, Headmistress, Chennai Girls Higher Secondary School, 2-A, School Road, Perambur, Chennai 600 011. ..Respondents in W.P.No.22670/2019 1/34 [2/14, 15:38] Sekarreporter: 3 W.P.Nos.22670/2019 & 113/2020 interview based on the marks secured by the Petitioner in the Main Written Examination, in pursuant to the Notification No.19/2016 dated 09.11.2016 issued by the 1st Respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Prayer in W.P.No.113 of 2020 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned final selection list to the post of Deputy Collector in No. Nil dated 20.02.2019 issued by the 2 nd respondent and to quash the same insofar as non-consideration of the petitioner for selection and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner for selection to the post of Deputy Collector by allowing him to undergo the process of interview based on the marks secured by him in the Written Examination in pursuant to Notification No.19/2016 dated 09.11.2016 issued by the 2 nd respondent, by validating the answer sheet for Paper-III Main Written Examination held on 15.10.2017, with all consequential and other attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vidhuthalai (both WPs) Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents : Ms.C.N.G.Niraimathi Standing counsel [for R 1 & R 2 in W.P.No.22670/2019 [for R 2 & R 3 in W.P.No.113/2020] 3/34 [2/14, 15:39] Sekarreporter: 31 W.P.Nos.22670/2019 & 113/2020 in a very delicate position. On the one hand, the Court finds that the petitioner deserves to be considered for selection and on the other hand, this Court is not able to give any positive relief to the petitioner due to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. However, this Court cannot express its helplessness and deprive the petitioner of an opportunity to be considered for selection. 39.The State Government is the 1st respondent in the present writ petition. It is left to the State Government to see if any additional post of Deputy Collector can be created or is available to accommodate the petitioner, if in case he secures sufficient marks in Paper-III, if it is sent for evaluation and the petitioner also gets through the oral interview. This extreme relief is contemplated taking into account the sheer merit of the petitioner and the marks secured by him in the other two papers. Ultimately, the State must not loose the chance of getting the services of a meritorious candidate as a Deputy Collector. The 1st respondent shall examine the same and pass orders within a period of two weeks from today. If the post can be created, the same shall be intimated to TNPSC and in turn the TNPSC shall evaluate Paper-III and in the event of the petitioner securing the required marks, he shall be sent for oral interview and if the petitioner comes out successfully, the petitioner can be accommodated in the post of Deputy Collector. This process shall be completed within a period of four weeks after TNPSC 31/34 [2/14, 15:39] Sekarreporter: 32 W.P.Nos.22670/2019 & 113/2020 receives the instructions from the State Government. 40.The relief that has been given in the present case cannot be cited as a precedent in any case since it was given after considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and after considering the merits in favour of the petitioner. Both the Writ Petitions are disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 14.02.2020 Index: Yes Internet:Yes KP To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, 32/34
eps filed counter in election commission two leave issue https://youtu.be/cvMXMSnl5yk?si=-z4yAGW56wwM29PT March 13, 2024 by Sekar Reporter · Published March 13, 2024
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.Nos.3219, 3221 and 3223 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.3219 of 2023 Shanthi … Petitioner Vs. The State by Inspector of Police SIT, Chinnasalem Kallakurichi District. (Crime No.236 of 2022) … Respondent. this Court sets aside condition No.3 of the order dated 04.11.2022, 04.11.2022 and 07.11.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. Kallakurichi (FAC) Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi, in Crl.M.P.Nos. 1518 of 2022, 1519 of 2022 and 1520 of 2022 and gives permission to the petitioner(s) to sell the vehicles. April 26, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published April 26, 2023
Demand, acceptance and recovery’ – these are the three factors essential in a corruption case where a bribe-taking public servant is arrested and prosecuted, the Madras high courthas said while lamenting that even a special legislation like the Prevention of Corruption Act had failed to put fear in the heart of corrupt babus. Justice B Pugalendi made the observation while confirming three-year jail term and 1 lakh fine imposed on P V Reddy, a senior divisional engineer of southern Railway, by a special court for CBI cases in Madurai. Reddy was caught accepting 1 lakh as bribe from a railway contractor in 2008. February 1, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published February 1, 2020