In murasoli trust case when it came up yesterday it was pointed out by me that Mr L Murugan Vice chairman prior to his appointment as VC was functioning as National Secretary for SC/ST cell in BJP and that he stood in Rasipuram 2011 elections in BJP ticket and lost the elections and hence the claim of political and personal bias against Petitioner trust is justified . I also filed documents to substantiate the same . I further submitted that petitioner has filed application for impleading chairman National Commissiom for Sc and amendment to the cause title to the effect that National commission be represented by Secretary instead of VC has to be allowed. The learned judge allowed impleading of chairman National commission for Sc and in amendment ordered notice. When Karthikeyan Asst solicitor General asked to vacate the stay , the learned judge refused and asked the Vice Chairman L Murugan to keep away from hearing as per earlier directions . I also submitted that Srinivasan the petitioner before commission is not an SC and he cannot seek such reliefs. I filed a memo to record that orders oftheHon’ble court dated 2.1.2020 has been complied with. The learned judge posted the matter to 6.3.2020 for service notice on Chairman .
![[30/05, 22:25] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/XfLJGwqECkg?si=rQ0-JudtoSfdOYlB[30/05, 22:26] sekarreporter1: Honble justice K K RAMAKRISHNAN of Madurai bench of Madras HC Freedom of speech vs personal reputation… suggestions to PTI for framing Regulations particularly reporting private religious individuals and its impact on society.. references to religious scriptures ,etc …sec 499/500/501/502/ of IPC ..](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
