Follow:
- Next story Centre, judiciary break ice over appointment of HC, SC judges
- Previous story Local body election case full order video camara case v Parthiban judge order PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to count the votes of one Panchayat out of 14 Panchayats at one time for the Ward No.19 of Salem District Panchayat, to declare the results of the said Panchayats and thereafter to start the counting of votes of other Panchayats similarly and consequently direct the respondents to permit a Committee of persons including the petitioner, the candidates for Panchayat Union Ward members, Salem District, the candidates for the Village Panchayat President, the candidates for the Village Panchayat Ward Member, the election agent and the counting agents to be present for the opening of the ballot boxes, the counting of votes and the declaration of results. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondents :Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr.B.Neduncheziyan for RR1 Mr.S.R.Rajagopal, AAG assisted by Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayan, GP and Mr.V.Shanmuga Sundaram, Spl.GP for R2 Mrs.Narmadha Sampath, AAG for Mr.E.Balamurugan for RR3 & 4 COMMON ORDER
Recent Posts
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
More
Recent Posts
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
