SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

20/04, 18:32] Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1781668440492986773?s=46relax Model Code of Conduct[20/04, 18:32] sekarreporter1: The voting for Parliamentary Elections 2024 have been completed in certain states, such as Tamil Nadu. Therefore, the @ECISVEEP Election Commission of India should consider relaxing the Model Code of Conduct in these states to enable them to carry out their functions without hindrance, including welfare measures, new policies, recruitment, etc. Freezing the state government activities until June 4th is like suspending democracy for no valid reasons and punishing the people. Currently, people are not allowed to carry cash of more than 50k within the states. The decision to continue the same Model Code of Conduct in these States appears highly arbitrary and unjustified.

Uncategorized

20/04, 18:32] Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1781668440492986773?s=46relax Model Code of Conduct[20/04, 18:32] sekarreporter1: The voting for Parliamentary Elections 2024 have been completed in certain states, such as Tamil Nadu. Therefore, the @ECISVEEP Election Commission of India should consider relaxing the Model Code of Conduct in these states to enable them to carry out their functions without hindrance, including welfare measures, new policies, recruitment, etc. Freezing the state government activities until June 4th is like suspending democracy for no valid reasons and punishing the people. Currently, people are not allowed to carry cash of more than 50k within the states. The decision to continue the same Model Code of Conduct in these States appears highly arbitrary and unjustified.

[20/04, 18:32] Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1781668440492986773?s=46relax Model Code of Conduct[20/04, 18:32] sekarreporter1: The voting for Parliamentary Elections 2024 have been completed in certain states, such as Tamil Nadu. Therefore, the @ECISVEEP Election Commission of...

The first bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy recently dismissed the petitions filed by the Employers’ Federation of Southern India and industrial houses including KCP Limited, Sundaram Clayton Limited and Rane Engine Valve Limited, saying that no vested interests of the petitioners were affected by the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015.

Uncategorized

The first bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy recently dismissed the petitions filed by the Employers’ Federation of Southern India and industrial houses including KCP Limited, Sundaram Clayton Limited and Rane Engine Valve Limited, saying that no vested interests of the petitioners were affected by the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015.

Tamil Nadu Madras HC junks pleas against amendments to Bonus Act They had challenged the amendment to section 2(13) of the Act which increased the salary ceiling limit of eligibility for bonus to Rs...

Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )

Uncategorized

Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )

[20/04, 11:16] Vnothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC...

[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus

Uncategorized

[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus

[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus

Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning

Uncategorized

Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning

[20/04, 11:16] sekarreporter1: [20/04, 11:13] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781559028222677225?t=sglFPu6mD9kFqudsRSaS1Q&s=08[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: 👍👍[20/04, 11:22]...

The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its judgment on an appeal challenging the Madras High Court’s decision that downloading and possessing child pornography is not a criminal offence.

Uncategorized

The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its judgment on an appeal challenging the Madras High Court’s decision that downloading and possessing child pornography is not a criminal offence.

MenuSearch SearchHindustan Times NewsSign inHomeLatest NewsHT PremiumCricketEducationIndiaWorldCitiesEntertainmentLifestyleAstrologyReal EstateShop NowUP Board Result LiveTaylor Swift: A PrimerElection Schedule 2024Win IPhone 15IPL 2024IPL 2024 ScheduleIPL Points TableIPL Purple CapIPL Orange CapAP Board Results 2024HTCityThe InterviewVideosPhotosTrendingWeb StoriesTechBusinessVirat KohliSportsDelhi...

Minister sekar babu pa case full order / mhc/ Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third respondent is not on election duty and if the third respondent, being a government servant, engages in acts which are not in consonance with the Tamil Nadu Government Servants’ Conduct Rules, 1973, then it is for the employer to take action. He further submits that respondents 1 and 2 would take necessaryaction on the basis of the complaint received from the petitioner.In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of.There shall be no order as to costs.(S.V.G., CJ.) (J.S.N.P., J.)18.04.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NosasiTo:1.The Election Commissioner,Election Commission of India, Nivachan Bhavan, New Delhi.2.The Chief Electoral Officer,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,Chennai-600 009. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(sasi)

Uncategorized

Minister sekar babu pa case full order / mhc/ Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third respondent is not on election duty and if the third respondent, being a government servant, engages in acts which are not in consonance with the Tamil Nadu Government Servants’ Conduct Rules, 1973, then it is for the employer to take action. He further submits that respondents 1 and 2 would take necessaryaction on the basis of the complaint received from the petitioner.In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of.There shall be no order as to costs.(S.V.G., CJ.) (J.S.N.P., J.)18.04.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NosasiTo:1.The Election Commissioner,Election Commission of India, Nivachan Bhavan, New Delhi.2.The Chief Electoral Officer,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,Chennai-600 009. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(sasi)

Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third respondent is not on election duty and if the third respondent, being a government servant, engages in acts which are not in...