Follow:
- Next story Your email address GET IT TOIOPEN APP CITY Madras HC upholds conviction of man who murdered pregnant woman TNN | Updated: Dec 23, 2019, 9:51 IST AA Representative image The Madras high court has confirmed a lower court’s conviction and sentence awarded to a man for murdering a pregnant woman, stating that the case was proved beyond all reasonable doubts. The division bench of Justice T Raja and Justice B Pugalendhi observed, “Since the deceased woman became pregnant following the illegal affair with the appellant, there was a strong motive for the appellant to murder the woman. There is a recovery of ear and nose studs from the appellant’s house and the medical evidence shows that she suffered a homicidal death proves the case of the prosecution.” The prosecution had proved that Natarajan, a mason, had murdered the woman who was working as a coolie under him in Trichy. The two were in an intimate relationship and after becoming pregnant she had demanded they get married. As Natarajan was already married and has children, he murdered the woman and buried her in 2006. When the family members started searching for the deceased woman eight days after she went missing, Natarajan voluntarily confessed about the murder after which a case was registered at the Thuvakudi police station and he was arrested. The III additional district and sessions court at Trichy convicted and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment on November 14, 2016. Natarajan filed an appeal before the Madurai bench in 2018. Since the incriminating circumstances forms a complete chain without any missing links, unerringly proceeding towards the only conclusion that the convict had murdered the woman, the judges confirmed the conviction and sentence by the lower court and dismissed the appeal.Justice T Raja and Justice B Pugalendhi observed, “Since the deceased woman became pregnant following the illegal affair with the appellant, there was a strong motive for the appellant to murder the woman. There is a recovery of ear and nose studs from the appellant’s house and the medical evidence shows that she suffered a homicidal death proves the case of the prosecution.”
- Previous story Vasantha kumar advt -I stand for the present name : Madras High Court 🙏 [12/24, 13:12] Sekarreporter 1: 🌺
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment
More
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment