SC 9-judge bench frames seven questions for arguments on the larger issue of faith Vs fundamental right clash arising from controversy over women’s entry to Sabarimala, mosque and agiyari as well as the practice of female genital mutilation among Dawoodi Bohras.

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2020 · Updated February 10, 2020

You may also like...

• 

  Justices S. Vaidyanathan and P.T. Asha gave the suggestion to Additional Advocate General (AAG) P.H. Arvindh Pandian, who assured the court that he would take earnest steps to get a circular issued, at the earliest, to the executive officers of all temples under the control of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) department.

  February 12, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 12, 2020

• 

  Judge Chandru அலைகள் ஓய்வதில்லை

  December 16, 2019

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 16, 2019

• 

  THE HON’BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.660 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.6613 of 2023 Quality Property Management Service Private Limited, For Appellant     : Mr.Murali Kumaran                     For Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran,                                           Additional Advocate General,                                           Assisted by M/s.S.Varsha,                                           for R1                                            JUDGMENT (Made by the Hon’ble Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy) tender quashed.The Tender Committee may also consider making knowledge of Tamil or the local language of the area in which the school is located as mandatory for all those to be employed by the successful bidders;

  April 25, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 25, 2023