[27/06, 11:21] Vinothpandian: 2011 (14) SCC 401 : Ajit singh harnamsingh gujral vs state of maharastra : Hired killing would also ordinarily come within category of rarest of rare cases
[27/06, 11:21] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 914 : Goomo orbit corporate & leisure travels pvt ltd vs GI Retail pvt ltd : limitation period for initiating defamation suit for damages is one year from date of publication and from time such publication known to parties
[27/06, 11:22] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) SCC 10 : Prithipal singh vs state of punjab : For offences under IPC , torture is not permissible whether it occurs during investigation , interrogation or otherwise
[27/06, 11:22] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 9 : vassudev madkaikar vs state of goa ( FB ) : writ maintainable against person or authority on whom statutory duty imposed even if not public official or official body , mandamus also maintainable against private body when such body performs any public function
[27/06, 11:22] Vinothpandian: 2015 (4) SCC 164 ; Union of india vs SN maity : In matters pertaining to departmental proceedings , merely because words ” until further orders ” are used would not confer allowance on employer to act with caprice
[27/06, 11:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 97 : sarojinidevi A rep by power agent vs R Arumugam : code of civil procedure and civil rules of practice permits appearance of non – advocate to conduct litigation