Follow:
- Next story Journalists booked for interviewing Sri Lankan Tamil refugees granted bail
- Previous story Tata Sons had moved the Supreme Court challenging the NCLAT order that reinstated Cyrus Mistry as chairman, saying the verdict “undermined corporate democracy” and the “rights” of its board of directors
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court led by outgoing Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna released three sets of documents to shore up public confidence in its internal processes. These include: PDF documents detailing the procedure for the appointment of Supreme Court and High Court judges;
- Supreme Court held that while considering an appeal against the order of the Trial Court refusing to grant an injunction pending the disposal of the suit, the High Court can’t dismiss the substantive portion of the suit itself and direct that the remaining part of the suit be agitated in a suit filed by the defendant. The Apex Court was
- MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P. No.17422 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.19755 and 19757 of 2025 Muthukumar J. …. Petitioner vs. The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home,
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
More
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court led by outgoing Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna released three sets of documents to shore up public confidence in its internal processes. These include: PDF documents detailing the procedure for the appointment of Supreme Court and High Court judges;
- Supreme Court held that while considering an appeal against the order of the Trial Court refusing to grant an injunction pending the disposal of the suit, the High Court can’t dismiss the substantive portion of the suit itself and direct that the remaining part of the suit be agitated in a suit filed by the defendant. The Apex Court was
- MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P. No.17422 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.19755 and 19757 of 2025 Muthukumar J. …. Petitioner vs. The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home,
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27