You may also like...
-
-
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN C.R.P.(NPD).No.574 of 2005 Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Thirukoil Palani, Rep. by its Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer. … Petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sriram For Respondents : No appearance O R D E R 20.In fine, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the fair & decreetal order dated 10.08.2004 made in E.A.No.37 of 2002 in E.P.No.258 of 1999 in OP.No.4 of 1994 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Udumalpet is hereby set aside and accordingly, Petition in E.A.No.37 of 2002 in E.P.No.258 of 1999 in OP.No.4 of 1994 filed by the Temple/Petitioner is hereby stands allowed. No costs.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 23, 2022
-
Justice P.N. Prakash said he did not find any manifest illegality in the order passed by a judicial magistrate court in Salem in 2012 and confirmed by a sessions court in 2014 while dismissing a revision petition preferred by the man under Section 397 of the CrPC. The judge pointed out that an order by a judicial or metropolitan magistrate for payment of monthly maintenance to parents, wife or children could be challenged by way of a criminal revision petition either before a High Court or a sessions court.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 25, 2020