The lunch motion moved by Nalini Chidambaram for Karti and Srinidhi chidambaram citing that Senior Counsel KTS Tulsi is here for some case and not for the case of KC and SKC cannot be entertained in the absence of order of CJ.
Kc and skc filed quash petitions by 12 noon hurriedly n served copies to Income Tax Public Prosecutors at 1.30 and brought the case at 2.15 seeking quash and stay.
The petition did not mention tat the case is before the spl court for trial related to mp and mla’s . It mentioned case nos pertaining to the egmore acmm court .
The lunch motion moved by Nalini Chidambaram for Karti and Srinidhi chidambaram citing that Senior Counsel KTS Tulsi is here for some case and not for the case of KC and SKC cannot be entertained in the absence of order of CJ.
The order of CJ to be posted b4 Justice Anita Sumanth was only challenging transfer of the case from acmm court to spl sessions court for mp and mla and not for the quash petitions which were filed in the afternoon. .
When there is a portfolio HC judge to hear HC cases related to elected representatives, in the absence of any order to bring it before justice raja manickam , he refused to hear it . He expressed his concern tat he was not informed that the urgent motion was for the case of KC and SKC which had to be posted before the portfolio judge audikesavalu
