You may also like...
-
-
5.This Court is of the considered opinion that the Judicial Officers cannot be unnecessarily pressurized by the higher courts. No doubt, in some cases, the higher courts do direct the Trial Courts to expedite the cases, however, it cannot be a routine affair so as to cause unnecessary pressure in the minds of the Judicial Officers, who all are already working in difficult situations. If at all several such directions are issued by the higher courts for the speedy disposal of suits or cases, it may not be practically possible for the Trial Courts to dispose of all such cases. Thus, the pendency involved, and the capacity of the Courts to dispose of the cases are to be taken into consideration by the higher courts while issuing a direction to dispose of the cases in a speedy manner. Complex situations are also to be considered in a practical and pragmatic way, so as to ensure that the Judicial Officers perform their duties in a free and peaceful manner. 6.This being the principles to be followed, the Trial Court in the present case has to take effort to dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible and it is to be borne in mind that all cases are to be treated equally and no litigant can claim unnecessary preference unless there is a justification for the speedy disposal. 7.Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. sha 07.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To Trial Court/learned Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.J., sha C.R.P.(P.D) No.4058 of 2022 07.12.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 30, 2022
-