[11/05, 11:47] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 476 : national laminate corporation , mumbai vs Euro merchandise pvt ltd : In a SARFASI litigation , merely because a borrower desires to approach higher court cannot be a ground to stay an order already passed as against him
[11/05, 11:47] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993 )
[11/05, 11:47] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[11/05, 11:47] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 479 : sushma suri & another vs mahamedha urban co – op bank ltd : In a suit for declaration , anti dating document or entries to overcome injunctions passed by courts would prima facie constitute fraud
[11/05, 11:47] Vinothpandian: 2009 (1) CPR 98 : gurkirpal singh vs stevon soni : Authority under consumer protection act can award damages / compensation against deficiency in service