[23/05, 06:15] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) CTC 187 : vijay singh vs shanti devi SC : once ex parte decree is set aside , parties would be relegated to position at which they were when ex parte decree was passed ( order 9 rule 13 CPC 1908 )
[23/05, 06:15] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 337 : fazaullah khan vs M Akbar contractor (d) rep by LRS : Interim orders granted by supreme court not automatically vacated beyond six months period , such interim order must continue to be in force till appeal decided
[23/05, 06:15] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) CCC 329 : santhakumari vs Raghavan unni : under order x111 CPC court has ample power to weed out inadmissible document or a document which is not a valid document at all in eye of law
[23/05, 06:15] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC 767 : Ripudaman singh vs balkrishna : cheque issued by purchaser of a property not honoured , disputes cannot be considered in petition under section 482 CRPC , such disputes to be considered only in regular trial
[23/05, 06:15] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 4298 : sunil CB singh baghel and others vs state of maharastra : With regard to media reporting of criminal trial , sessions judge has no power to pass order banning print , electronic and social media from.publishing posting and reporting court proceedings , it is only high court and supreme court that have power to pass postponement orders in exceptional circumstances for a brief period