today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993 )
[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2011 (6) SCC 396 : Bhagwan dass vs state ( NCT ) of delhi : Honour killing , for whatever reason came within category of rarest of rare cases deserving death punishment
[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement : civil appeal no 901 of 2022 dated 3- 02 – 2022 New Okhla industrial development authority vs yunus : In a land acquisition proceedings award passed by lok Adalat cannot form basis for redetermination of compensation
[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: criminal appeal no 185 -186 of 2022 dated 7- 02- 2022 serious fraud investigation office vs Rahul modi : In a default bail case right conferred on accused under section 167 (2) CRPC 1973 cannot be exercised after charge – sheet submitted and cognizance taken
[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) SCC 755 : Bharat broad band network ltd vs United telecoms ltd : when a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator , it is his duty to disclose in writing any circumstances which are likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality ( arbitration and conciliation act 1996 sec 34 )
[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2011 (8) SCC 679 : Bakshi dev raj & another vs sudhir kumar : Held in order to safeguard reputation of counsel and to uphold prestige and dignity of legal profession , it is always desirable to get instructions in writing from the client ( order 3 rule 1 & 4 CPC 1908 )
[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) MWN ( cr ) 76 SC : union of india vs dharam pal : prolonged delay in execution of death sentence would have dehumanitizing effect
