Today for dmk senior advocate Nalini Chithambaram argued in the RK nagar election bribery case madam done heated arguments by Sekar Reporter · December 18, 2019 15NEWS CITIES CHENNAICHENNAICan’t make public steps related to 2017 R.K. Nagar bribery case, EC tells HCA view of the Madras High Court. | Photo Credit: V.GanesanLegal CorrespondentCHENNAI 16 NOVEMBER 2019 00:44 ISTUPDATED: 16 NOVEMBER 2019 03:51 IST FIR was quashed by a single judge of the court without poll panel’s knowledgeThe Election Commission (EC) on Friday told the Madras High Court that it cannot make public the steps being taken by it with regard to the 2017 Dr. Radhakrishnan Nagar bypoll bribery case First Information Report (FIR), which got quashed by a single judge of the court without its knowledge.A Division Bench of Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and M. Nirmal Kumar was told by Niranjan Rajagopalan, standing counsel for EC, that his instructions were that for the present, the commission did not want to disclose details in public though it had submitted all requisite information for the exclusive perusal of the court. Today for dmk senior advocate Nalini Chithambaram argued The submissions were made when senior counsel P. Wilson, representing N. Maruthu Ganesh, the DMK candidate during the 2017 bypoll, insisted that the EC, Income Tax department as well as the police should be ordered to make public all documents related to the issue on hand.“They want to keep everything top secret. In a democracy, there should be some transparency. We want to know what is happening. They cannot withhold all important documents and ask me to argue this case. They are not revealing crucial information,” senior counsel argued after filing a memo insisting upon disclosure of all documents.The EC had rescinded the bypoll in April 2017 after the I-T sleuths raided several places and seized crucial documents from the residence of the Health Minister. The documents were related to ₹89.65 crore having been reportedly given to various Ministers, including Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami, for distribution among voters of R.K. Nagar.Then, AIADMK had fielded T.T.V. Dhinakaran as its candidate in the constituency. Though an FIR was registered by the Abhiramapuram police here at the instance of the EC with regard to seizure of money, it got quashed by a single judge of the High Court in March 2018 without the commission’s knowledge.Hence, Mr. Ganesh had approached the court insisting upon a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into the entire issue. During the course of hearing of the case on Friday, Justice Sathyanarayanan pointed out that former AIADMK Minister V. Senthil Balaji, who was also allegedly involved in the distribution of money, had now swiched to the DMK.Later, he granted time till December 18 for the EC to file its reply to the memo preferred by Mr. Ganesh
Legal Eagles Elites presents Crash Course for APP (Main Examination) & Civil / District Judge (Preliminary Examination) on Zoom Topic: The Indian Penal Code – 1860 Guest Faculty: S. Maha Shanmugam, Advocate, Thanjavur January 2, 2022 by Sekar Reporter · Published January 2, 2022
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULAW.P. No.2282 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2479 of 2024N.Jayamoorthi … PetitionerDead body of SC was buried in Vanniyar Land . Court passed above ordered . February 9, 2024 by Sekar Reporter · Published February 9, 2024
THE HON’BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.2476 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.2579 of 2023 CA.V.Venkata Siva Kumar … Petitioner Versus 1. IDBI Bank Limited Represented by Mrs.K.Bhoomalakshmi General Manager 2. Insolvency Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) Represented by Deputy General Manager 3. Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI (IIIPI) Represented by Managing Director … Respondents March 24, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published March 24, 2023