Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 248 -250 of 2015 dated 20-05-2022 manoj and others vs state of madhya pradesh : In a criminal trial public opinion neither an objective circumstance relating to crime , nor the criminal, and the courts must exercise judicial restraint and play a balancing role , ” Role of public prosecutor is intrinsically dedicated to conducting a fair trial and not for a ” thirst to reach the case in conviction “
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( c) no 9164 of 2022 dated 5 – 08 – 2022 Ruchi Rawat vs Principal judge , family court : In matrimonial matters , wife’s convenience must be looked at while considering transfer petitions
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2014 (5) CTC 546 : Harshad govardhan sondagar vs international assets reconstruction ltd : In a SARFASI proceedings tenant aggrieved by taking possession of secured asset by secured creditor cannot seek injunction
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 248 -250 of 2015 dated 20-05-2022 manoj and others vs state of madhya pradesh : In a criminal trial public opinion neither an objective circumstance relating to crime , nor the criminal, and the courts must exercise judicial restraint and play a balancing role , ” Role of public prosecutor is intrinsically dedicated to conducting a fair trial and not for a ” thirst to reach the case in conviction “
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( c) no 9164 of 2022 dated 5 – 08 – 2022 Ruchi Rawat vs Principal judge , family court : In matrimonial matters , wife’s convenience must be looked at while considering transfer petitions
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2014 (5) CTC 546 : Harshad govardhan sondagar vs international assets reconstruction ltd : In a SARFASI proceedings tenant aggrieved by taking possession of secured asset by secured creditor cannot seek injunction against it under the rent control act
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 892 of 2020 dated 10 – 08 – 2022 mehmood pracha vs central administrative tribunal : In a contempt proceedings , denial of right of trial amounts to miscarriage of justice
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 812 : Dhananjezhiyan vs kuppu : Registration act 1908 sec 17 & 49 : unstamped and unregistered document is inadmissible in evidence , it cannot be relied upon in court proceedings when such document becomes basis of claim of person tracing his or her title
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) DRTC 1 : M/ S Hindon forge pvt Ltd vs state of Uttar pradesh through district magistrate Ghaziabad : section.17 of the SARFASI act gets attracted once possession is taken under rule 8( 1) and 8(2) of the securities read with section 13( 4 ) of the SARFASI act
[22/08, 11:08] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) Acquittal 519 : Ranjanben maheshbhai vasava vs state of gujarat : In a criminal proceedings accused is entitled to benefit of plea set up by lawyer but it cannot be said that plea or defence which his lawyer puts forward must bind the accused