Vinoth pandian law

[2/3, 14:00] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) CPJ 236 : marvel omega builders pvt ltd vs shrihari Gokhale : Pertaining to booking of residential villa , denial of possession despite substantial payment , national commission awarded refund of entire principal amount along with compensation in form of 10% simple interest as well as sum of Rs 25000 as cost of litigation ( consumer protection act )
[2/3, 14:00] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) CPJ 28 ; Jiten k Ajmera vs M/ S Tejas cooperative housing society : under order XLI rule 27 CPC a party can produce additional evidence at appellate stage if it establishes that notwithstanding exercise of due diligence , such evidence was not within its knowledge or could not even after exercise of due diligence be produced by it at the time when decree appealed against was passed
[2/3, 14:00] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) crimes SC 243 : state of madhya pradesh vs Man singh : High court has no jurisdiction to review its order either under section 362 or under section 482 CRPC
[2/4, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) MWN ( cri ) 49 : surinder singh deswal vs virender Gandhi: Amendment providing for deposit of minimum of 20% of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial court for appeal , amendment not taking away vested substantial right of appeal of the accused , such amendment would be retrospective , section 148 of NI act can be applied to complaints filed prior to 1- 09- 2018
[2/4, 11:44] Vinothpandian: 2014 supreme 663 : P malathi vs state of Telangana : mere negligence is not sufficient pertaining to death of a patient , to fasten criminal liability gross negligence and high recklessness on part of the doctors is required

You may also like...