Vinothpandian: 1998 (1) RCR ( criminal ) 484 : koko vs hassan bano : A binding judicial pronouncement cannot be made ineffective by exercise of legislative power [11/29, 13:06] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 644 : sunita vs Rajasthan state transport

[11/29, 13:05] Vinothpandian: 1998 (1) RCR ( criminal ) 484 : koko vs hassan bano : A binding judicial pronouncement cannot be made ineffective by exercise of legislative power
[11/29, 13:06] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 644 : sunita vs Rajasthan state transport corporation : ordinarily evidence not re examined or re – appreciated by apex court , however apex court can interfere if finding recorded in judgement in appeal found to be manifestly wrong or perverse ( article 136 constitution of india )
[11/29, 13:06] Vinothpandian: 2003 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 115 SC : charanjit singh vs RC jain : SLP before supreme court , petitioner using wild language and levelling irrelevant allegation against judges of sub ordinate courts , no case on merit , SLP rejected in limine for filing pleadings of contemptous , irrelevant and incoherent nature without disclosing any question of law
[11/29, 13:06] Vinothpandian: 1974 (2) SCC 660 : Rahim khan vs khurshid Ahmed : opinion evidence is hearsay and becomes relevant only if the condition laid down in sec 47 of the evidence act is first proved