Vinothpandian: 2009 (1) SCC 73 : chandra shekhar AK vs state of kerala : Benefit of pay scale after revision is ordinarily available to employee who was in service on the date from which revised pay scale is given effect retrospectively[31/05, 10:45] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) CCC 240 SC : K srinivas vs K sunita : Hindu marriage act 1955 section 13 (1)(1a) : Either spouse filing false criminal cases , invariably and clearly constitute matrimonial cruelty , the other spouse would be entitled to claim a divorce

[31/05, 10:45] Vinothpandian: 2009 (1) SCC 73 : chandra shekhar AK vs state of kerala : Benefit of pay scale after revision is ordinarily available to employee who was in service on the date from which revised pay scale is given effect retrospectively
[31/05, 10:45] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) CCC 240 SC : K srinivas vs K sunita : Hindu marriage act 1955 section 13 (1)(1a) : Either spouse filing false criminal cases , invariably and clearly constitute matrimonial cruelty , the other spouse would be entitled to claim a divorce
[31/05, 10:45] Vinothpandian: AIR 2006 cal 92 : madan mohan das vs karthick chandra das : order 8 rule CPC 1908 : defendant appeared inspite of fact that no summons was issued to him . ” written statement filed beyond expiry of 90 days can be accepted
[31/05, 10:45] Vinothpandian: 2020 (6) CTC 390 : Rukkaiah natchiar vs PMS mohamed Aamina beevi : Advocate commissioners report essentially court documents and form part of record under order 26 rule 10 CPC 1908
[31/05, 10:45] Vinothpandian: 2020 (6) CTC 313 : govindhji jewat & co vs Rukmani mills ltd : property taken possession under SARFASI act , held bank holds first charge by virtue of prior mortgage , attachment after mortgage cannot affect pre – existing right of bank