Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) SCC 307 : kanwar singh saini vs high court of delhi : for violation of a judgement or decree , provisions of criminal contempt not attracted

[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) SCC 307 : kanwar singh saini vs high court of delhi : for violation of a judgement or decree , provisions of criminal contempt not attracted
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 476 : national laminate corporation , mumbai vs Euro merchandise pvt ltd : In a SARFASI litigation , merely because a borrower desires to approach higher court cannot be a ground to stay an order already passed as against him
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 488 : super cassettes industries ltd vs music broadcast pvt ltd : Held in matters under order 39 rules 1 & 2 and sec 151 CPC 1908 , an interim relief granting final relief should be given after exercise of great caution and in rare and exceptional cases
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2015 (12) SCC 46 : Rohini traders vs JK lakshmi cement ltd : Held object of order X11 rule 8 of the code is to facilitate the plaintiff or any other party to get a document on record which is not in their possession or in possession of the other party
[2/17, 10:54] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 475 ; Dr Bibhas debnath vs state of west bengal : pleadings in a proceedings under sec 125 CRPC are like pleadings in a civil case and pleadings could be amended in appropriate circumstances