SEKAR REPORTER

Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CTC 639 : sidharth S vs P lalitha kumari : Power under order 38 rule 5 CPC 1908 is drastic and extraordinary , such power should not be exercised mechanically or merely for asking[25/07, 10:46] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 1209

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

[25/07, 10:46] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) CTC 639 : sidharth S vs P lalitha kumari : Power under order 38 rule 5 CPC 1908 is drastic and extraordinary , such power should not be exercised mechanically or merely for asking
[25/07, 10:46] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 1209 of 2021 dated 21- 10-2021 : Absconder / proclaimed offender not entitled to relief of anticipatory bail
[25/07, 10:46] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Sartaj Singh vs state of haryana criminal appeal no 298- 299 of 2021 dated 15- 03 – 2021 : Accused can be summoned on basis of even examination in chief of witness and court need not wait till his cross examination
[25/07, 10:46] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) MLJ 544 : madhav prasad agarwal vs Axis bank Ltd; Relief sought to reject plaint against one defendant suffers from.jurisdictional error cannot be entertained under order 7 rule (11) ( d) CPC 1908
[25/07, 10:46] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) MLJ ( cri ) 289 : union of india vs state of maharashtra: provisions of a statute not acceptable to court, court can strike it down , provisions found deficient can be pointed out to legislature for correction
[25/07, 10:46] Vinothpandian: 2018 (4) crimes SC 232 : Reema Salkan vs sumer Singh Salkan : A well qualified and able bodied man cannot be absolved of his liability to maintain his wife merely on a plea of not possessing any source of income

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Exit mobile version