Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 365 : Balaji baliram mupade vs state of maharastra : judgements normally to be prounounced within 2 months of conclusion of arguments , on expiry of 3 months parties can file application in high court seeking early judgement

[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 365 : Balaji baliram mupade vs state of maharastra : judgements normally to be prounounced within 2 months of conclusion of arguments , on expiry of 3 months parties can file application in high court seeking early judgement
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 600 : kotak mahindra bank pvt ltd vs Ambuj A kasliwal SC : ordinarily deposit of 50% of decretal amount due mandatory under sec 21 of RDDBFI act , but in appropriate cases for reasons to be recorded deposit of at least 25% permissible
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2020 (4) CTC 497 : Ravindranath GE medical associates pvt ltd chennai vs P Raja rao : while granting interim injunction or continuing existing injunction , court must see if there is bonafide contest between parties , court must also find which side balance of convenience lies ( order 39 CPC 1908 )
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : An injunction which is sought by pleading wrong facts is liable to be vacated ( order 39 rule 1 CPC 1908 )
[2/18, 10:37] Vinothpandian: 2009 (5) SCC 713 : vimal chand ghevarchand jain vs Ramakant eknath jadoo : Held equitable relief can be prayed for by a party which approaches court with clean hands