WP 32394 OF 2023 – PETITIONER: MOHAMED YOUSUF, JUDGEMENT BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND ARGUED BY DR. B. RAMASWAMY SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR THE INCOME TAX. The Petitioner had filed 10 grievances in the for refund in the Income tax portal. Dr. B. Ramaswamy argued that all the 10 grievances filed by the petitioner in Income Tax Portal was wrongly filed and they are supposed to be filed in CPCITR portal. So filing in the wrong portal will lead to unnecessary delay and it is not going to be processed. Therefore, the Hon’ble Justice directed the petitioner to file freshly in correct CPCITR portal to proceed further with the petitioner’s grievances. After following all the procedure, the petitioner can file application for refund.
WP 32394 OF 2023 – PETITIONER: MOHAMED YOUSUF, JUDGEMENT BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND ARGUED BY DR. B. RAMASWAMY SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL FOR THE INCOME TAX.
The Petitioner had filed 10 grievances in the for refund in the Income tax portal. Dr. B. Ramaswamy argued that all the 10 grievances filed by the petitioner in Income Tax Portal was wrongly filed and they are supposed to be filed in CPCITR portal. So filing in the wrong portal will lead to unnecessary delay and it is not going to be processed. Therefore, the Hon’ble Justice directed the petitioner to file freshly in correct CPCITR portal to proceed further with the petitioner’s grievances. After following all the procedure, the petitioner can file application for refund.
