Follow:
- Next story ஐ.பி.எல். போட்டிகளுக்கான டிக்கெட்களை மொத்தமாக வாங்கி, அதனை 10 மடங்கு அதிக விலைக்கு கள்ளச்சந்தையில் விற்பதாக வழக்கு.
- Previous story தேர்தலில் பதிவான வாக்குகளுடன், ஒப்புகை சீட்டுகளை 100 சதவிகிதம் சரிபார்க்கக் கோரிய வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி
Recent Posts
- Sunday urgent hearing / THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUCrl.O.P.No. 11045 of 2024GopinathS/o.(Late) Nagarajan … PetitionerVsThe State through:The Inspector of Police,
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didn’t have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
More
Recent Posts
- Sunday urgent hearing / THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUCrl.O.P.No. 11045 of 2024GopinathS/o.(Late) Nagarajan … PetitionerVsThe State through:The Inspector of Police,
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didn’t have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.