You may also like...
-
Justices N. Kirubakaran and P. Velmurugan raised the questions in an interim order passed by them on an income-tax appeal preferred by a private pharmaceutical company which had spent ₹42.81 lakh in 2012-13 towards sales promotion expenses, which included payments made to doctors for promoting the company’s medicines, and claimed tax exemption.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 9, 2020
-
[9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: The validity of Sec. 10(1)(I) of the NMC Act, 2019 has been upheld. Court has held that all medical colleges, including those run by deemed universities, will come under NMC fee fixation only. With respect to the Office Memorandum, the Court has held that directing fees for 50% of seats to be fixed equivalent to govt college fees will result in cross subsidy which is barred by the Supreme Court. The court has further held that the same will also result in seats going vacant due to high fees. Therefore, the Court has directed the NMC to reconsider and issue a fresh Office Memorandum in light of the judgment. Till then, the court has directed that existing fee fixation practise will continue. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Mr. Vijaynarayan, PS Raman and ArL Sundaresan appeared for petitioners. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Learned ASG appeared for respondents.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 9, 2022
-