[09/05, 08:57] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.

Article by
E.Duraivaiyapuri,
Advocate,
YMCA Building,
Chennai – 1.
[09/05, 08:58] sekarreporter1: 👍

[09/05, 08:57] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy provided under Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C., and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.

Article by
E.Duraivaiyapuri,
Advocate,
YMCA Building,
Chennai – 1.
[09/05, 08:58] sekarreporter1: 👍