![, THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P. No.26506 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.25572 & 25574 of 2022 this Court has no hesitation to hold that the petitioner would be entitled to get a special reservation for third gender viz., transgender category for admission in the said course for which the prospectus in question has been issued by the. For Petitioner : Mrs.Reshmi Christy For Respondents : Mr.U.M.Ravichandran Special Govt. Pleader [R1 & R2] : Ms.M.Sneha Standing Counsel [R3] O R D E R](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Acter jayapratha casevfull order. THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.Nos.22258,22370,22374, 22377 ,22378,22379,22380, 22381,22383,22384 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.22258 of 2023 & batch 1. M/s Jayapradha Cine Theatre(A-1. For Petitioners :Mr.A.Abdul Hameed, Senior Counsel for Mrs.Revathi Manivannan For Respondent :Mr.T.N.C.Kaushick Standing Counsel/Spl.P.P.for ESI )
- Previous story The Division Bench of Honble Justice R Subramanian and Honble Justice kalai Mathi disposed of the Appeal filed by Enforcement Directorate against TTV Dinakaran holding that the Order of Adjudication of Rs 28 crores against TTV Dinakaran will be a debt within the meaning of Insolvency Act and TTV Dinakaran will be a Debtor and Government of India will be a Creditor for the said amount and Insolvency laws applies for the said outstanding amount which TTV Dinakaran has failed to pay. While confirming that the old insolvency notice which was issued is set aside as it was issued when the order of adjudication at that point of time had not become final, the Bench has held it is open to the Government of India to issue fresh insolvency notice for the defaulted amount of Rs 28 crores.
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol
More
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol