Follow:
- Next story The Result: In the result, these contempt appeals are partly allowed and are disposed of on the following terms: The unconditional apology tendered by the appellants is accepted; The sentence of imprisonment and fine imposed vide order dated 02.08.2023 in CONT.P(MD)No.374 of 2020 is set aside; The undertaking of payment of interest at the rate of 6% p.a., on Rs.1,38,486/- from 05.08.2019 till 28.07.2023 forthwith on receipt of the copy of this order is recorded; No costs; Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.S.S.R.,J.) (D.B.C.,J) 25.09.2023 sji NCC : Yes / No Index:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Note : It can be seen in this case, when no ground existed for review, an opinion was rendered to file a review and ultimately it was not filed. When an observation was made that the Order passed was prima facie contemptuous, a contempt appeal is filed, when there is no punishment so as to maintain an appeal under section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and when there is no ‘judgment’ determining the rights of parties even to maintain an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. Hence, a copy of this order shall be marked to the Learned Advocate General for his consideration. S.S.SUNDAR, J. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J. sji To 1.Pradeeph Yadav, I.A.S., The Secretary, to the State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort. St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.Muthupalanichamy, The Director of Teacher Education Research and Training Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 009. 3.Boobala Anto, The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training Munanjipatti, Tirunelveli District. CONT.A(MD)Nos.8 and 9 of 2023 25.09.2023
- Previous story Plaint copy of edapady palanisamy IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) C.S.No. of 2023 Edapadi K. Palanisamy …Plaintiff Vs. Dhanapal S/o Sellappa Gound, Samuthiram, Kattuvalavu, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District. …Defendant PLAINT UNDER ORDER IV RULE 1 ORIGINAL SIDE RULES READ WITH ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE The Plaintiff above named humbly submits as follows: The Plaintiff is Edapadi K. Palanisamy, S/o Karuppa Gounder, Hindu, aged about 69 years, presently–600 028. The address for service of notices and Court processes on the Plaintiff above named is that of his Counsels M/s. S.R.RAGHUNATHAN, V. ANIL KUMAR and PRAVEENNATH SELVAM,
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol
More
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol