Follow:
- Next story https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1726966660555579585?t=uN__9xbgbZFI4gptZDTGLw&s=08 HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA W.P.No.31458 of 2023 & W.M.P. Nos. 31077, 31079 & 31082 of 2023 Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees’ Federation, Represented by its General Secretary, In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed except for the fourth prayer for criminal prosecution against the respondents 5, 6 and 10 as the same is unwarranted and is dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. The tender notice dated 30.09.2023 in Tender Document No.63/ 14563/ NA2/ MTC/ 2023 is set aside. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajoy Khose For R1 to R4 : Mr.D. Gopal, Government Advocate For R5 : Mr. R.Ramanlal, Additional Advocate General IV Assisted by Mr.A.Vinoth Raj Standing Counsel. For R6 : Mr.L.S.M. Hasan Fizal, Additional Government Pleader Standing Counsel for SETC For R7 : Ms. P.S. Pavithra For R8 : Mr. M. Aswin For R9 : Mr. A. Sundaravadhanan For R10 : Mr. M. Murali Vinodh For R11&R12 : Mr. C. Gauthamaraj ORDER
- Previous story [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1726956515750519164?t=VqgJBzyjGJLSkUcTl3pWXg&s=08 [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: in behalf of ugc asg ARL Sundaresan arguments# It was stated by the Madras University in the last hearing that they had not received grants from UGC. UGC had filed an affidavit setting out the details of grants released by UGC to Madras University on a regular basis. The Honble Chief Justice observed that from institutions of this level there should not be such statements. It was further argued that the nomination of UGC member in the search panel for VC was mandatory and MU and Govt of TN were bound by it. Chief bench At the end at the request of Learned AG case was adjourned
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol
More
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol