[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) LW 70 : Mohan N vs P govindasami : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 ; limitation for rejection of plaint mixed question of law and facts , can be determined only after taking consideration into the evidences before court[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2019( 6) CTC 670 : Boomadevi B vs district collector kanchipuram : judgement be passed in case of specific performance even if passed exparte , decree passed on basis of false and frivolous suit is nullity[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 815 : Ravichandran AR vs magnitude realtors : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : limitation aspect could be taken into consideration only if it is prima facie barred by limitation not under presumption and assumptions[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence
[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) LW 70 : Mohan N vs P govindasami : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 ; limitation for rejection of plaint mixed question of law and facts , can be determined only after taking consideration into the evidences before court
[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2019( 6) CTC 670 : Boomadevi B vs district collector kanchipuram : judgement be passed in case of specific performance even if passed exparte , decree passed on basis of false and frivolous suit is nullity
[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) MLJ 815 : Ravichandran AR vs magnitude realtors : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : limitation aspect could be taken into consideration only if it is prima facie barred by limitation not under presumption and assumptions
[12/09, 13:11] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence
