12 law tips of Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) CCC 461 : Ragni chopra vs Rajesh : To read a particular passage in a document is not a correct method of its interpretation , document is to be read as a whole to gather its true import

[1/6, 15:56] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) CCC 461 : Ragni chopra vs Rajesh : To read a particular passage in a document is not a correct method of its interpretation , document is to be read as a whole to gather its true import
[1/6, 15:56] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 1 SC : Harshad govardhan sondagar vs IARC ltd : A lease of secured asset made by borrower after he receives notice under sec 13 (2) of SARFASI act from secured creditor intending to enforce that secured asset will not be valid lease
[1/6, 15:56] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) DRTC 234 : Anjana vs AP vardhaman ( mahila ) cooperative bank ltd : supreme court on many occasions cautioned ” forum shopping ” ought not too be encouraged
[1/6, 15:56] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) crimes 309 : Shahejadkhan mahebubkhan pathan vs state of gujarat : Where a substantial term of imprisonment is inflicted , an excessive fine should not be imposed except in exceptional cases
[1/6, 15:56] Vinothpandian: 1981 (3) SCC 675 : Hari obula reddi vs state of Andhra pradesh : Evidence of interested witnesses is not necessarily unreliable evidence
[1/7, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court ; WP No ( criminal ) 113 of 2016 dated 3 – 01 – 2023 : kaushal kishor vs state of Uttar pradesh : In India , the government can be held liable for tortious acts of its servants and can be ordered to be paid compensation to the persons suffering as a result of the legal wrong
[1/7, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : civil appeal no 8442 of 2022 dated 14 -11- 2022 : M/ S Laxmi srinivasa R and P boiled rice milk vs state of Andhra pradesh : while adjudicating delay petition under limitation act , exclusion of time is different and cannot be equated with condonation of delay under section 14 of limitation act
[1/7, 11:54] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) MWN ( cri ) 626 : Dhurga vaishnavi shivamoorthi vs murthy : conduct of accused subsequent to release on bail and supervening circumstances alone relevant for cancellation of bail ( sec 439 (2) CRPC 1973 )
[1/7, 11:54] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 309 : Lakshya concosts pvt ltd vs bank of baroda : chief metropolitan magistrate or district magistrate only empowered to assist secured creditor in taking over possession of secured asset ( sec 14 SARFASI act )
[1/7, 11:54] Vinothpandian: 2013 (3) RCR (cri ) 76 : Prem kaur vs state of punjab : In a judgement , absence of sound reasons is not a mere irregularity , but a patent illegality
[1/9, 12:38] Vinothpandian: 2012 (8) SCC 706 : church of christ charitable trust & educational society vs Ponniamman educational trust : To reject plaint even before registration of plaint on one or more grounds mentioned in order 7 rule 11 CPC , held other defendants need not necessarily be heard at all as it does not affect their rights
[1/9, 12:57] Vinothpandian: AIR 2015 SC 242 : Tajender singh ghambir vs Gurpreet singh & others : Held deficiency in court – fee in respect of plaint can be rectified or made good during the appellate stage ( order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 )