[13/07, 08:45] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:44] sekarreporter1: “Justices S.M. Subramanian and C. Kumarappan refused to declare provisions 3(1)(c) and 10(2(f) of the RBI-IOS 2021 unconstitutional. It held that advocates enjoy only a statutory right and not a fundamental right to appear before judicial and quasi judicial fora.
N.A. Srinivasan, a practising advocate, had filed a writ petition in 2022 challenging the two provisions of the RBI-IOS 2021 which enables customers of banks, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), payment system participants and credit information companies to get their grievances redressed”
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/advocates-cannot-represent-complainants-before-rbi-ombudsman-rules-madras-high-court/article68395863.ece#:~:text=Justices%20S.M,their%20grievances%20redressed
[13/07, 08:44] sekarreporter1: 🌹
[13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:46] sekarreporter1: “Justices R Subramanian and R Sakthivel recently passed the orders on a petition about the refusal of registration of property documents by a sub-registrar in Namakkal district.
The bench said it finds that in the recent past, many sub-registrars have refused to register non-testamentary instruments – dealing with immovable property – on the ground of attachment orders, passed by a Civil Court. It cites the encumbrance certificate even though it is brought to the knowledge of the sub-registrars that the suit, in which the order of attachment was passed, has either been disposed of or dismissed.”
https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/11/madras-hc-orders-civil-courts-to-ensure-proper-communication-of-attachment-order-disposals#:~:text=Justices%20R%20Subramanian,of%20or%20dismissed.
[13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: .🌹
[13/07, 08:48] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: this court deems it appropriate to draw the attention of the chief secretary of Tamil Nadu to look into this aspect with special attention and take appropriate steps to bring the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2016 or any other subsequent scheme in tune with the orders passed by this court,” said Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar.
[13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: 👍
[13/07, 08:48] sekarreporter1: Excluding parents from govt insurance scheme arbitrary and illegal, says HC – http://toi.in/cxBVCZ/a31ga8
Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now:
https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare
[13/07, 08:58] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:58] sekarreporter1: “which he is eligible on compassionate grounds by applying the principles of parity by re considering the representation, D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J. while quashing the impugned orders, has declared the Government order dated 18-08-2021 illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India to the extent it excludes male heirs completely from compassionate appointment.”
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/07/12/madras-high-court-quashes-govt-order-excluding-male-heir-compassionate-appointment-noon-meal-scheme-illegal-and-violative-art-14-16-of-constitution/#:~:text=which%20he%20is,from%20compassionate%20appointment.
[13/07, 08:58] sekarreporter1: 👍
[13/07, 08:45] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:44] sekarreporter1: “Justices S.M. Subramanian and C. Kumarappan refused to declare provisions 3(1)(c) and 10(2(f) of the RBI-IOS 2021 unconstitutional. It held that advocates enjoy only a statutory right and not a fundamental right to appear before judicial and quasi judicial fora.
N.A. Srinivasan, a practising advocate, had filed a writ petition in 2022 challenging the two provisions of the RBI-IOS 2021 which enables customers of banks, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), payment system participants and credit information companies to get their grievances redressed”
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/advocates-cannot-represent-complainants-before-rbi-ombudsman-rules-madras-high-court/article68395863.ece#:~:text=Justices%20S.M,their%20grievances%20redressed
[13/07, 08:44] sekarreporter1: 🌹
[13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:46] sekarreporter1: “Justices R Subramanian and R Sakthivel recently passed the orders on a petition about the refusal of registration of property documents by a sub-registrar in Namakkal district.
The bench said it finds that in the recent past, many sub-registrars have refused to register non-testamentary instruments – dealing with immovable property – on the ground of attachment orders, passed by a Civil Court. It cites the encumbrance certificate even though it is brought to the knowledge of the sub-registrars that the suit, in which the order of attachment was passed, has either been disposed of or dismissed.”
https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Jul/11/madras-hc-orders-civil-courts-to-ensure-proper-communication-of-attachment-order-disposals#:~:text=Justices%20R%20Subramanian,of%20or%20dismissed.
[13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: .🌹
[13/07, 08:48] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: this court deems it appropriate to draw the attention of the chief secretary of Tamil Nadu to look into this aspect with special attention and take appropriate steps to bring the New Health Insurance Scheme, 2016 or any other subsequent scheme in tune with the orders passed by this court,” said Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar.
[13/07, 08:47] sekarreporter1: 👍
[13/07, 08:48] sekarreporter1: Excluding parents from govt insurance scheme arbitrary and illegal, says HC – http://toi.in/cxBVCZ/a31ga8
Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now:
https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare
[13/07, 08:58] sekarreporter1: [13/07, 08:58] sekarreporter1: “which he is eligible on compassionate grounds by applying the principles of parity by re considering the representation, D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J. while quashing the impugned orders, has declared the Government order dated 18-08-2021 illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India to the extent it excludes male heirs completely from compassionate appointment.”
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/07/12/madras-high-court-quashes-govt-order-excluding-male-heir-compassionate-appointment-noon-meal-scheme-illegal-and-violative-art-14-16-of-constitution/#:~:text=which%20he%20is,from%20compassionate%20appointment.
[13/07, 08:58] sekarreporter1: 👍
