[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 1979 (2) SCC 286 : union of india vs J Ahmed : Deficiency in personal character or personal ability do not constitute misconduct for taking disciplinary proceedings[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2002 (7) SCC 117 ; nallabothu venkaiah vs state of Andhra pradesh : The principle that no innocent man ahould be punished is equally applicable that no guilt man should be allowed to go unpunished , wrong acquittal of accused will send a wrong signal to the society[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2007 (10) SCC 561 : divisional controller GSRTC vs kadarbhai J suthar : mere acquittal in criminal case does not have the effect of nullifying the decision taken in departmental proceedings as they operate in different areas of considerations[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2006 (7) SCC 410 : General manager appellate authority bank of india vs mohd nizamuddin : gravity of misconduct has to be measured in terms of the nature of misconduct[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) CCC 20 : G subramani vs IV Rajasekaran : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : A plaint cannot be rejected based on defence statement of defendant made in written statement or any averment made in affidavit filed in support of application filed under order 7 rule 11 of CPC

[6/19, 20:41] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/5972BxwySv4 [6/19, 20:41] Sekarreporter: ஆன்லைன் வகுப்புகளில் பங்கேற்பது மாணவர்களுக்கு பெரும் சவாலாக உள்ளது -மதுரை ஐகோர்ட்டு கருத்து வருகைப்பதிவு இல்லை என்று 10-ம் வகுப்பு மாணவனின் தேர்ச்சியை நிராகரித்த நடவடிக்கையை ரத்து செய்த மதுரை ஐகோர்ட்டு, ஆன்லைன் வகுப்புகளில் பங்கேற்பது என்பது மாணவர்களுக்கு பெரும் சவாலாக உள்ளது எனவும் கருத்து தெரிவித்தது. https://dailythanthi.com/amp/News/Districts/2021/06/19012541/Attending-online-classes-can-be-a-great-challenge.vpf

June 19, 2021

$Full order of quashing FIR. THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI CRL. O.P. NOS. 3730, 4227, 4095 & 11206 OF 2021 CRL. M.P. NOS. 6647, 6649, 2218, 2601, 2679, 3388, 6708 & 6709 OF 2021 W.P. NO. 1397 OF 2021 AND W.M.P. NO. 5917 OF 2021 country, which has resulted in the Central Government interfering in the administration of IL & FS and its group companies by filing petition before NCLT for reconstitution of the Board, which was been discussed above. The various orders passed by the Tribunal at the interference of the Central Government clearly show that all is not well with IL & FS and its group companies and also the persons, who were manning the said companies, of which the petitioners also formed a part then. Though the petitioners had come out of the post of Directors, it is not to be forgotten that the action by the Central Government in filing petition before the NCLT and ordering of investigation by SFIO clearly show the economic imbalance which the group companies had created in derailing the economy of the country. Finding has been rendered by NCLT that the petitioners were within the Committee of Directors who were at the helm of affairs in running IL & FS and its group companies. This Court, by quashing the case relating to TNPID Act, by no stretch, is giving a clean chit to the petitioners herein, as persons who are beyond a pale of doubt. This Court has only quashed the case against the petitioners on the ground that the investigation under the TNPID Act by the 1st respondent is not sustainable for the reasons and discussions aforesaid. The petitioners, as the Committee of Directors, have created a economic crisis for the whole group of companies and the persons, who were shareholders in the said companies. It is the assertion of the intervenors that the petitioners have siphoned off huge sums of money, in the form of salary and perquisites by holding the post of Directors and with the aid of it, had purchased very many immovable properties across the globe. The intervenors also submitted through their oral arguments certain materials, which the intervenors claim are properties purchased by the petitioners in many of the foreign countries. However, this Court is not entering into the said domain to find out the truth or otherwise in the said submissions. It is borne out by record that investigation has been assigned to SFIO by the Central Government and that SFIO is seized of the matter and investigation is being carried out by SFIO. As already pointed out above, the jurisdiction of the SFIO is vast and SFIO is clothed with powers to investigate into matters not only related to the Companies Act, but concerning any law, be it enacted by the State or the Central Government, so long as there seems to be an infraction of the said law. Such being the case, the intervenors, if in possession of information, which would be valuable to SFIO in their on-going investigation, could very well provide the information available with them relating to the immovable properties, which are alleged to be held by the petitioners, which, according to the submission of the intervenors are the result of the siphoning off money from the group companies to enrich themselves and any additional material provided by the intervenors would be a material on which SFIO could investigate and try to find the truth and veracity of the very many transactions.$

You may also like...

Recent Posts

Recent Posts

You may also like...

Police Dgp Rajesh das case —full order #W.P.No.6591 of 2021 (Through Video Conferencing) ANAND VENKATESH, J. Status Report – V, was filed by the Investigation Officer. The relevant portions in the Status Report are extracted hereunder:

Recent Posts

Recent Posts