, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating[21/03, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 197 : Allahabad

[21/03, 14:28]

, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating
[21/03, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 197 : Allahabad

: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating
[21/03, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 197 : Allahabad bank vs shivganga tube well & others : with regard to suit for enforcement of money secured by mortgage , period of limitation would be 12 years from date when money becomes due
[21/03, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 488 : super cassettes industries ltd vs music broadcast pvt ltd : Held in matters under order 39 rules 1 & 2 and sec 151 CPC 1908 , an interim relief granting final relief should be given after exercise of great caution and in rare and exceptional cases
[21/03, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2011 (12) SCC 1 : pankaj mahajan vs dimple @ kajal : In a matrimonial proceedings , it has been held giving repeated threats to commit suicide amounts to cruelty , when such a thing is repeated in the form of sign or gesture , no spouse can live peacefully
[21/03, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 35 : Devis ispat ltd vs state bank of india : issues relating to validity of decision of declaring an account as non – performing asset essentially relates to disputed question of facts and accounting , in this regard writ jurisdiction is neither permissible nor advisable in law ( sec 13 ( 3- A ) SARFASI act )
[21/03, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) DRTC 761 : Ratan kumar & others vs state bank of india : Any third party right created after issuance of notice under section 13(2) of SARFASI act has to be ignored