You may also like...
-
-
sekarreporter1: நான்.்junior ஆக இருக்கும் போது வாதாட பயமாக இருக்கும். இதற்காக 3 மாதம் வழக்குகளில் நான் வாய்தா வாங்கசென்றேன். மூத்த வக்கீல் g subrmaniyam, வாய்தா வாங்கனும்னா, தன் அமர்ந்துள்ள இடத்தில் நிறைய புத்தகங்களை விரித்து வைத்திருப்பார் இதை பார்த்துவிட்டு நீதிபதிகள் அவர்களே வாய்தா கொடுத்துடுவாங்க , advocacy பற்றி அருமையான speech ssj
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 10, 2024
-
[15/07, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 117 : sarasu vs Ravi : sec 5 limitation act : Application for condoning delay filed under sec 5 to be dealt with liberally and leniently in order to do substantial justice to parties ,length of delay not a material factor for deciding application under section 5 of limitation act[15/07, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2018(1) BC 158 ( DB ) : Kumar Rohit vs Allahabad bank : Auction sale which proceeded on misrepresentation to intending bidders is definitely illegal and liable to be quashed[15/07, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2020 (2) CTC 142 : Karuppuraj M vs M ganesan : review not maintainable merely an alternative decision to be taken by court , raising new plea not permissible in review ( order 47 rule 1 CPC 1908 )[15/07, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2016 (10) SCC 676 : state bank of travancore vs R sobhana : Courts making scathing remarks on banks unwarranted and can be expunged[15/07, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) CCC 532 : Buddha jagadeeswara rao vs sri ravi enterprises : courts obliged to intimate registrar office after cancellation of an instrument of transfer of any immovable property , section.49 of the indian registration act permits admission of unregistered documents in evidence for collateral purposes , but it should be duly stamped[15/07, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 15, 2024