[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CCC 445 : HDFC bank ltd vs M/ S gee kay international and others : Held an illusion in the plaint can certainly be unravelled and exposed by the court while dealing with an application under order 7 rule 11 CPC[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2015 (3) CCC 440 : chander kala vs inderprastha cooperative housing society : summoning of opposite party as its own witnesses cannot be allowed ( order 16 rule 1 CPC 1908 )[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) DRTC 261 : Axis bank ltd vs Bhanu oil & dal mills : Transaction of wrongly clearing of cheque by bank cannot be said that there has been a debt ,[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 576 : sahara industries , patrampur road vs state bank of india : RDDBFI act as well as SARFASI act being complementary to each other and there is no provision in either of acts to debar initiation of a proceeding under SARFASI act during pendency of proceeding under RDDBFI act
[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CCC 445 : HDFC bank ltd vs M/ S gee kay international and others : Held an illusion in the plaint can certainly be unravelled and exposed by the court while dealing with an application under order 7 rule 11 CPC
[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2015 (3) CCC 440 : chander kala vs inderprastha cooperative housing society : summoning of opposite party as its own witnesses cannot be allowed ( order 16 rule 1 CPC 1908 )
[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) DRTC 261 : Axis bank ltd vs Bhanu oil & dal mills : Transaction of wrongly clearing of cheque by bank cannot be said that there has been a debt ,
[16/09, 10:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 576 : sahara industries , patrampur road vs state bank of india : RDDBFI act as well as SARFASI act being complementary to each other and there is no provision in either of acts to debar initiation of a proceeding under SARFASI act during pendency of proceeding under RDDBFI act
