Follow:
- Next story மக்களின் பாதுகாப்பை கருத்தில் கொண்டு பெட்ரோல் விற்பனை நிலையங்களின் உரிமம் வழங்குவதற்கு முன் மத்திய பெட்ரோலியம் மற்றும் வெடி பொருள் பாதுகாப்பு அமைப்பு நேரில் ஆய்வு செய்ய வேண்டும் என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது
- Previous story Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 691 : Punjab national bank vs consumer disputes redressal forum & others : section 34 of the SARFASI act expressly barred jurisdiction of not only civil courts but also of other authorities which would include consumer forum from granting injunction in respect of any action taken or to be taken under SARFASI act
Recent Posts
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.
More
Recent Posts
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.