18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications[18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held

[18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications
[18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower
[18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2019(5) CTC 914 : Goomo orbit corporate & leisure travels vs GI retail Pvt Ltd : order 6 rule 4 CPC : party relying on misrepresentation ,fraud ,breach of trust ,wilful default or any undue influence must plead all particulars including dates and items ,mere bald allegation of misrepresentation to public ,without such particulars ,do not establish misrepresentation
[18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2013(4) CTC 468 : G Subramani vs V Rajasekar an : CPC 1908 order 7rule 11 : plaint not to be rejected on basis of defence made in written statement ,bar of res judicata an issue to be raised and decided and not a ground to reject plaint

You may also like...