Follow:
- Next story SM subramaniyam judge and Rajasekar judge full order ////// Finally, regarding the quantum of punishment, we are of the opinion that the Judicial Officers are expected to maintain high level of integrity and in the present case, the charge Nos.1 and 4 against the writ petitioner, were held proved. The proved charges, viz., charge Nos.1 and 4 are grave in nature, touching upon the integrity and honesty of the Judicial Officer. Therefore, the punishment of removal from service, cannot be construed as disproportionate to the gravity of the proved charges. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the quantum of punishment. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
- Previous story [18/03, 12:27] sekarreporter1: செந்தில் பாலாஜி தன்னை ED வழக்கிலிருந்து விடுவிக்கக் கூறிய மனு
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol
More
Recent Posts
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
- Order quashed /THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYW.P.No.9701 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.10724 & 10726 of 2024AP Studio Enterprises,Represented by the Proprietor,Mr.Subramani Eswaran Narsingapuram,Shop No.3, Door No.1, Ellis Road,Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. …PetitionerVs.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC),Chepauk Assessment Circle,Integrated Buildings for Commercial Taxes,
- Justice Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court criticises his own judgement, says it requires reconsiderationhttps://youtu.be/IW_AmkVWt8Y?si=QNusSZnBSONArpol