[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2012 (3) All India criminal LR SC 197 : munna kumar upadhyaya vs state of AP : If the accused gave incorrect or false answers during the course of his statement under section 313 CRPC , the court can draw an adverse inference against him[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 673 : K padma vs K Ramachandran & others : Property attached in favour of bank earlier to alleged agreement for sale , provisions of sec 64 of CPC not applicable[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) All India criminal LR ( DB ) 456 : Re : Ketabul SK : mere failure to disclose pendency of a bail application before a superior court is not a relevant ground for cancellation of bail ( sec 438 CRPC 1973 )[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) RAJ 304 : Bablu ghosh vs Amrit fresh pvt ltd : Held an erroneous view of law on a debatable point or a wrong exposition of law or a wrong application of law or a failure to apply proper law cannot be considered a mistake or error apparent on face of record
[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2012 (3) All India criminal LR SC 197 : munna kumar upadhyaya vs state of AP : If the accused gave incorrect or false answers during the course of his statement under section 313 CRPC , the court can draw an adverse inference against him
[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 673 : K padma vs K Ramachandran & others : Property attached in favour of bank earlier to alleged agreement for sale , provisions of sec 64 of CPC not applicable
[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) All India criminal LR ( DB ) 456 : Re : Ketabul SK : mere failure to disclose pendency of a bail application before a superior court is not a relevant ground for cancellation of bail ( sec 438 CRPC 1973 )
[19/08, 12:20] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) RAJ 304 : Bablu ghosh vs Amrit fresh pvt ltd : Held an erroneous view of law on a debatable point or a wrong exposition of law or a wrong application of law or a failure to apply proper law cannot be considered a mistake or error apparent on face of record
