Follow:
- Next story HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit
- Previous story Sc order we are of the view that the issue of territorial jurisdiction cannot be decided in a writ petition, especially when there is a serious factual dispute about the place/places of commission of the offence. Hence, this question should be raised by the petitioner before the Special Court, since an answer to the same would depend upon evidence as to the places where any one or more of the processes or activities mentioned in Section 3 were carried out. Therefore, giving liberty to the petitioner to raise the issue of territorial jurisdiction before the Trial Court, this writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. …………………………….J. (V. Ramasubramanian) …………………………….J. (J.B. Pardiwala) New Delhi February 07, 2023
Recent Posts
- today law tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: THE HON’BLE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT IN R.MALA CASE REPORTED IN 2007 (3) LW 68 HELD THAT: –
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating
- Neet exam / THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHANW.P.(MD)No.9920 of 2024Ms.MonishaVs.
- Chief justice gankapurwala and judge baratha chakravarthy i) In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void and ultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiated against the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424, 14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399, 17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the following terms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act (Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declared to be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590, 26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.
More
Recent Posts
- today law tips DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: THE HON’BLE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT IN R.MALA CASE REPORTED IN 2007 (3) LW 68 HELD THAT: –
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 165 ; suryalakshmi cotton mills ltd vs Rajvir industries ltd : commercial expediencies may lead a person to issue blank cheques and filling up of blanks in a cheque itself would not amount to forgery or cheating
- Neet exam / THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHANW.P.(MD)No.9920 of 2024Ms.MonishaVs.
- Chief justice gankapurwala and judge baratha chakravarthy i) In view of our decision holding the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 as repugnant, void and ultra vires the Constitution, the proceedings initiated against the appellants by issuance of show cause notices in exercise of the power of such enactment are unsustainable and, as such, the common order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.7.2023 in W.P.Nos.17331, 13507, 13510, 13514, 14424, 14426, 14428, 14432, 16963, 17164, 17399, 17371, 18475 and 18479 of 2023 is set aside.
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the following terms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act (Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declared to be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590, 26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.