[23/07, 20:18] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815760588695605563?t=KDe0wXUd4C5CqiGCiTexEA&s=08[23/07, 20:18] sekarreporter1: P.PRAVEEN SAMADHANAM. EC MEMBER.NO.1MADRAS HIGH COURT ADVOCATES’ ASSOCIATION…

by Sekar Reporter · July 23, 2024

[23/07, 20:18] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1815760588695605563?t=KDe0wXUd4C5CqiGCiTexEA&s=08
[23/07, 20:18] sekarreporter1: P.PRAVEEN SAMADHANAM. EC MEMBER.NO.1
MADRAS HIGH COURT ADVOCATES’ ASSOCIATION…

You may also like...

• 

  Today’s tips for judicial exam aspirants*

  August 28, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 28, 2020

• 

  Tamil Nadu Govt tells Madras HC that small temples shall be kept open on Vinayagar Chaturthi day. Devotees can leave their small worshipped idols outside those temples. HR&CE dept shall collect those idols and dispose them of by immersing in water bodies and so on

  September 6, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 6, 2021

• 

  already held by this court, the first respondent, who recorded the reasons for reopening the assessment under section 148(2), has no jurisdiction over the appellant, to issue notice dated 28.03.2018 under section 148(1). Though the files pertaining to the reassessment proceedings of the appellant were transferred, the second respondent has no authority to continue the reassessment proceedings under section 129 and hence, the notice dated 14.12.2018 issued by him is also held to be invalid. The invalid notices so issued by the respondents vitiate the entire reassessment proceedings initiated against the appellant. Admittedly, no notice under section 148 was issued by the second respondent, who is the jurisdictional assessing officer, for reassessment of the return of income of the appellant, within the time frame stipulated under the Act. In this case, the limitation period of six years for reopening the assessment for the year 2011-12 under section 147 of the Act, came to an end on 31.03.2018. In such circumstances, there is no requirement for this court to go into the other issue based on the factual matrix projected by the appellant i.e., whether the appellant has disclosed fully and truly all the material particulars that are necessary for assessment for the relevant assessment year. In the ultimate analysis, the writ appeal stands allowed by setting aside the notices impugned in the writ petition and the order impugned herein. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  (R.M.D., J.)         (J.S.N.P., J.)          27.06.2022

  July 1, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 1, 2022