[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2011 (12) SCC 1 : pankaj mahajan vs dimple @ kajal : In a matrimonial proceedings , it has been held giving repeated threats to commit suicide amounts to cruelty , when such a thing is repeated in the form of sign or gesture , no spouse can live peacefully[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2012 (8) SCC 537 : state of UP vs sanjay kumar : life imprisonment cannot be equivalent to imprisonment for 14 years or 20 years , rather it always meant as the whole natural life[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 438 : church of South india trust association tiruchi vs M Ramesh : courts should order substituted service only if conditions in order 5 rule 20(1) exists[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 26 : Rajabathar KC vs B Purushothaman : sec 20 specific relief act 1963 : plaintiff paying 2/3 Rd sale consideration before filing suit ,increase in value of property noticed ,plaintiff directed to pay further sale consideration ,specific performance granted[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: AIR 2000 MAD 4 ; Akbar Ali vs Alla pitchai : It is the duty of court to issue notice to counsel who had filed caveat and without hearing the counsel , order should not be passed ( sec 148 A CPC 1908 )[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: AIR 1989 ALL 93 : Ram pyari devi vs 2 nd Addl district judge , Azamgarh : A court can go ahead to proceed to dispose of the suit ex parte if notice is served through publication which is a valid decree
[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2011 (12) SCC 1 : pankaj mahajan vs dimple @ kajal : In a matrimonial proceedings , it has been held giving repeated threats to commit suicide amounts to cruelty , when such a thing is repeated in the form of sign or gesture , no spouse can live peacefully
[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2012 (8) SCC 537 : state of UP vs sanjay kumar : life imprisonment cannot be equivalent to imprisonment for 14 years or 20 years , rather it always meant as the whole natural life
[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 438 : church of South india trust association tiruchi vs M Ramesh : courts should order substituted service only if conditions in order 5 rule 20(1) exists
[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 26 : Rajabathar KC vs B Purushothaman : sec 20 specific relief act 1963 : plaintiff paying 2/3 Rd sale consideration before filing suit ,increase in value of property noticed ,plaintiff directed to pay further sale consideration ,specific performance granted
[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: AIR 2000 MAD 4 ; Akbar Ali vs Alla pitchai : It is the duty of court to issue notice to counsel who had filed caveat and without hearing the counsel , order should not be passed ( sec 148 A CPC 1908 )
[24/06, 11:00] Vinothpandian: AIR 1989 ALL 93 : Ram pyari devi vs 2 nd Addl district judge , Azamgarh : A court can go ahead to proceed to dispose of the suit ex parte if notice is served through publication which is a valid decree
