25 law tips by vinoth pandian Vinothpandian: 2014 (3) CTC 676 : kannan S vs commissioner of police : court is not only custodian of rights of citizen but also rights of voiceless non – humans
[6/27, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2014 (3) CTC 676 : kannan S vs commissioner of police : court is not only custodian of rights of citizen but also rights of voiceless non – humans
[6/27, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2013 (5) SCC 762 : vinay tyagi vs Irshad Ali : A magistrate has power to direct ” further investigation ” after filing of a police report in terms of section 173 (6) of CRPC
[6/27, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2003 (4) RCR ( criminal ) 940 SC : Ashok kumar pandey vs state of west bengal : In a public interest litigation , whenever frivolous pleas are taken court should do well not only to dismiss the petitions but also to impose exemplary costs
[6/27, 10:42] Vinothpandian: AIR 1997 SC 448 : chintaman vs state of maharastra : mere oral evidence of sole transactions without filing certified copy of sale deed cannot make them admissible
[6/27, 10:42] Vinothpandian: AIR 2004 SC 1344 : M.D Army welfare housing organisation vs sumangal service pvt ltd : Under section 17 of the arbitration and coincilation act arbitrator is not empowered to issue any direction beyond reference or arbitration agreement
[6/27, 10:42] Vinothpandian: AIR 2003 AP 13 : SS Bajaj vs M/ S K.s ltd : security amount of third party deposited before criminal court cannot be attached unless and until court orders return of amount
[6/27, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 7 ( DB) : gopuram enterprises ltd vs integrated finance company ltd : Held post – award petition for interim measures maintainable only until award becomes enforceable ( section 9 Arbitration and coincilation act )
[6/28, 17:02] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) CCC 39 : KS vimalwswaran vs CPS charumathi : hindu marriage act 1955 section 24 : wife filing application for maintenance after the husband filed application for divorce , maintenance must be commensurate with the salary of the husband
[6/28, 17:02] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 111 : subhechhla welfare society vs earth infrastructure pvt ltd : Held recognized consumer association can file complaint on behalf of several consumers in one complaint
[6/28, 17:02] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 868 : N.N Global merchantile pvt ltd vs Indo unique flame ltd : Held civil aspect of fraud amenable to arbitration unless agreement itself has been rendered void
[6/28, 17:02] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) MWN ( cri ) 76 : union of india vs dharam pal : prolonged delay in execution of death sentence would have dehumanitizing effect
[6/28, 17:03] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) LW 172 : motilal vs BK babu sahib : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : court to consider averments in plaint alone at time of application for rejection of plaint
[6/28, 17:03] Vinothpandian: AIR 1996 SC 12 : Aboobaker Abdul Inamdar vs Harun Abdul.inamdar : CPC 1908 order 6 rule 1 : No amount of proof can substitute pleadings which are foundation of claim of a litigant party
[6/30, 09:44] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 86 : Union bank of india vs Rajendra wadhwa & others : As per rule 8(2) of the security interest rules possession notice is to be published in leading newspapers not later than seven days from date of taking possession
[6/30, 09:44] Vinothpandian: 2009 (1) CPJ 91 : ICICI bank ltd vs K venkatareddy : Non – disbursement of sanctioned loan amount s to deficiency in service on part of bank
[6/30, 09:44] Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be allowed to fluster the right of choice of an adult in choosing a man to whom she gets married
[6/30, 09:44] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 288 : Datti kameswari vs marrapu lakshmunaidu & others : evidence act 1872 section 65 : True copies of public documents certified by designated information officer can be taken as certified copies of public documents
[6/30, 09:44] Vinothpandian: 2009 (6) SCC 77 : SvL murthy vs state : section 6 banking regulation act : cheque discounting facility to the customer by bank is not a wrong practice
[6/30, 09:44] Vinothpandian: AIR 1999 MP 67 : Rajesh vs dalip : while fixing compensation in accident cases , where an injury was minor causing only partial disability and not a permanent one , the injured cannot claim the fixed amount of compensation as a matter of right
[6/30, 09:44] Vinothpandian: 2012 (8) supreme today 119 : Bihar state government secondary school teachers association vs bihar education service association : when the judgement of a court is confirmed by the higher court , the judicial discipline requires that court to accept that judgement and it should not in collateral proceedings write a judgement contrary to the confirmed judgement
[7/1, 13:00] Vinothpandian: AIR 1997 SC 448 : chintaman vs state of maharastra : mere oral evidence of sole transactions without filing certified copy of sale deed cannot make them admissible
[7/1, 13:01] Vinothpandian: AIR 2004 SC 1344 : M.D Army welfare housing organisation vs sumangal service pvt ltd : Under section 17 of the arbitration and coincilation act arbitrator is not empowered to issue any direction beyond reference or arbitration agreement
[7/1, 13:01] Vinothpandian: AIR 2003 AP 13 : SS Bajaj vs M/ S K.s ltd : security amount of third party deposited before criminal court cannot be attached unless and until court orders return of amount
[7/1, 13:02] Vinothpandian: AIR 2012 SC 309 : Inderjit singh grewal vs state of punjab : A subordinate criminal court cannot sit in appeal against the judgement and order of the superior civil court , having a different territorial jurisdiction
[7/1, 13:02] Vinothpandian: 2014 (6) CTC 393 : venkatakrishnan vs S vijayalakshmi : once it is brought to knowledge of subordinate court about its order being violated and if party seeks to punish contemnor , then subordinate court can exercise its power under section 151 of CPC by making such order making reference or committal to meet ends of justice
[7/2, 10:10] Vinothpandian: *Writt Petition No. 405/23 Karnataka HC. If life certificate is not submitted by pensioner, before stopping pension, _it is the duty of bank to visit the house of pensioner and know the reason for it_. Court ordered payment of arrears, and imposed fine of *₹. One lakh* on respondents
_Payment is to be made in two weeks, with *6* percent interest._ and if not made in 2 weeks, then at the rate of *18* percent interest. *Useful judgement for all the pensioners.*
All to note 👆
