Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI C.R.P.No.3839 of 2022 and CMP.No.20183 of 2022 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, Villupuram District. For Petitioners : Mr.Haja Nazirudeen Additional Advocate General-I Assisted by Mr.B.Vijay Additional Government Pleader and Mr.P.Haribabu, Government Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Nisser Ahmed for Mr.Gunasekaran Mr.Avinash Wadhwani for R1 Mrs. Srimathi for R2 ORDER Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands allowed and the impugned order in IA.No.30 of 2019 in OA.No.278 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai is hereby set aside. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 17.03.2023 Vv To 1. The Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, Chennai. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai-1. 3. The Inspector of Waqfs, Villupuram and Cuddalore District, No.512, Gandhi Street, Panruti. T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. Vv C.R.P.No.3839 of 2022 and CMP.No.20183 of 2022 17.03.2023
- Previous story Acj bench கல்கியின் நாவலை படிக்காத மனுதாரர் வரலாற்றை திரித்துள்ளதாக எப்படி கூற முடியும் என வழக்கு தள்ளுடி.
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that: