You may also like...
-
W.P.Nos.1606, 1608, 1609, 1610 & 1614 of 2024and W.M.P.Nos.1635, 1639, 1640, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1646, 1648, 1641 & 1649 of 2024SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,JWhile learned senior counsel for the petitioner relied on several judgments, including the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Radhakrishnan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2021)6 SCC 771, to contend that the impugned attachment orders are liable to be quashed, learned senior standing counsel for the respondents distinguished those judgments, cited other judgments such as Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax-I Lucknow, (2014)270 CTR 91 (Allahabad) and contended that the impugned order fully complies with the requirements of Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 16, 2024
-
-